Many years ago, I was involved with a project to upgrade the heating and air-conditioning systems in our older schools. The school did not have air conditioning and was heated by an old boiler system. The stakeholders decided that they would like to move toward heat pumps and condensing units. In addition to this they made the decision to replace windows with more efficient ones that were inoperable. New thermostats would be installed and controlled by a computer operated climate control software system.
The stakeholders consisted of the Director of Maintenance, the school board members, the Superintendent, and the Principal. The project was designed by an architect with the mechanical engineer designing and specifying the HVAC units necessary to serve the size of the facility. Looking back, it is easy to identify the stakeholder who was not consulted and who would be the source of the scope creep.
The project was completed over the summer and remained on schedule so the facility would be prepared for the new school year. It was obvious during the first week that changes would need to be made. Many of the teachers were angry that they could no longer open their windows and there were many complaints that they were not able to control their heaters either. You see the administration had made the decision to secure windows and thermostats as a means of controlling utility costs. However, the teacher’s union had not been involved or aware of the changes that would be occurring. “Project managers need to identify, understand, and engage each project’s diverse audience and stakeholders in order to lead everyone toward a successful project completion.” (Portny et al., 2008).
A meeting was held to discuss the issues and come to resolution. The windows had already been replaced and it would be too costly to change them out. However, a compromise was made where the teachers were given a 4 degree variance on the thermostat, although it still also be controlled by the computer control system. There would of course be an additional cost for the HVAC company to reprogram the thermostats. The work would need to be performed around the school schedule which would mean additional labor costs for weekends and evenings. The Director of Maintenance had insisted on contingency funds being set aside for the project and they were sufficient to cover the additional costs.
The scope creep could have been prevented. According to our textbook, “Getting the right people on board the project team and aligning the right project stakeholders provide critical resources and support during the course of the project.” (Portny et al., 2008, p. 108). It was a valuable lesson in project management.
References
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (n.d.). Project management concerns: ‘Scope creep’ [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu
Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.